KHANDU SHAHAJI SIRSAT vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/1566/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010162092026
Filing Number
BA/6850/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/1566/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KHANDU SHAHAJI SIRSAT
Adv. Shubhangi Parulekar
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
-
2.X.Y.Z.
Adv. Vrunda Vinod Surve
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Case Summary: BA/1566/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Khandu Shahaji Sirsat, accused of sexually assaulting his 13-year-old daughter in December 2022 under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(F), and 354. The court granted bail despite serious charges, considering the two-year delay in filing the complaint without explanation, the applicant's 19-month incarceration, lack of criminal antecedents, and slow trial progress. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
10-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
10-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/1566/2026
Case Summary: BA/1566/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Khandu Shahaji Sirsat, accused of sexually assaulting his 13-year-old daughter in December 2022 under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(F), and 354. The court granted bail despite serious charges, considering the two-year delay in filing the complaint without explanation, the applicant's 19-month incarceration, lack of criminal antecedents, and slow trial progress. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts