KHANDU SHAHAJI SIRSAT vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR — BA/1566/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010162092026
Filing Number
BA/6850/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Registration No
BA/1566/2026
Registration Date
01-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
KHANDU SHAHAJI SIRSAT
Adv. Shubhangi Parulekar
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR
X.Y.Z.
Adv. Vrunda Vinod Surve
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHIVKUMAR DIGE
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
| 04-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION (BAIL APPLICATIONS) |
Orders
Case Summary: BA/1566/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Khandu Shahaji Sirsat, accused of sexually assaulting his 13-year-old daughter in December 2022 under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(F), and 354. The court granted bail despite serious charges, considering the two-year delay in filing the complaint without explanation, the applicant's 19-month incarceration, lack of criminal antecedents, and slow trial progress. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: BA/1566/2026 The Bombay High Court granted bail to Khandu Shahaji Sirsat, accused of sexually assaulting his 13-year-old daughter in December 2022 under IPC Sections 376, 376(2)(F), and 354. The court granted bail despite serious charges, considering the two-year delay in filing the complaint without explanation, the applicant's 19-month incarceration, lack of criminal antecedents, and slow trial progress. Bail was granted on a PR bond of Rs. 25,000 with conditions prohibiting witness tampering and evidence interference. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts