ALLA RAKHI ZAHOOR SAYYED AND ORS. vs MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY — HCBM10161872026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

Next hearing 16-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010161872026

Filing Number

AO/9352/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. Jadhav

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ALLA RAKHI ZAHOOR SAYYED AND ORS.

    Adv. Bilal A Motorwala

  2. 2.ZULFIKAR ALI KHAN

  3. 3.AMJAD SULTAN SAYYED,

  4. 4.NAWAZ KHAJA QURESHI

  5. 5.MOHAMMAD MOSHIN SHAKIL QURESHI

  6. 6.ASLAM MOHAMMAD GAUS

  7. 7.FAIZAL MOHD. ASLAM SHAIKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUMBAI METROPOLITAN REGION DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Milind N. JadhavView PDF

    Case Summary The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal filed by seven plaintiffs against MMRDA's threatened eviction from transit accommodation rooms. The court varied the trial court's order rejecting the temporary injunction, directing that if MMRDA seeks eviction, it must follow due process of law and issue legal notice. The court disposed of all three interim applications, protecting all seven plaintiffs from coercive eviction action without proper procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 05-May-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal filed by seven plaintiffs against MMRDA's threatened eviction from transit accommodation rooms. The court varied the trial court's order rejecting the temporary injunction, directing that if MMRDA seeks eviction, it must follow due process of law and issue legal notice. The court disposed of all three interim applications, protecting all seven plaintiffs from coercive eviction action without proper procedural compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case