MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELPMENT CORPORATION THROU. ITS REGIONAL OFFICER vs PRASHANT KISAN JADHAV — WP/5893/2026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010161662026

Filing Number

WP/9341/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5893/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELPMENT CORPORATION THROU. ITS REGIONAL OFFICER

    Adv. Jay and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PRASHANT KISAN JADHAV

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay allowed WP 5893/2026, wherein Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation challenged the rejection of its application to amend its additional written statement. The court quashed the impugned rejection orders and permitted the amendments, holding that defendants are entitled to liberal consideration for amending pleadings with additional or alternative defences where prejudice to the plaintiff is remote. MIDC was directed to file amended copies within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5893/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed WP 5893/2026, wherein Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation challenged the rejection of its application to amend its additional written statement. The court quashed the impugned rejection orders and permitted the amendments, holding that defendants are entitled to liberal consideration for amending pleadings with additional or alternative defences where prejudice to the plaintiff is remote. MIDC was directed to file amended copies within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case