MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORTION vs VIKAS MAMANCHAND GOYAL — WP/5891/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010161622026
Filing Number
WP/9337/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Registration No
WP/5891/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORTION
Adv. Jay and Co
Respondent(s)
VIKAS MAMANCHAND GOYAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE N. J. JAMADAR
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay allowed MIDC's writ petition challenging the rejection of its application to amend additional written statements in the underlying civil suit against Vikas Mamanchand Goyal. The court quashed the lower court's rejection order, holding that amendments to pleadings must be considered liberally as defendants are entitled to raise additional and alternative defences with minimal prejudice risk to plaintiffs. MIDC was granted four weeks to file amended additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay allowed MIDC's writ petition challenging the rejection of its application to amend additional written statements in the underlying civil suit against Vikas Mamanchand Goyal. The court quashed the lower court's rejection order, holding that amendments to pleadings must be considered liberally as defendants are entitled to raise additional and alternative defences with minimal prejudice risk to plaintiffs. MIDC was granted four weeks to file amended additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts