MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORTION vs VIKAS MAMANCHAND GOYAL — WP/5891/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010161622026

Filing Number

WP/9337/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

WP/5891/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 11 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORTION

    Adv. Jay and Co

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VIKAS MAMANCHAND GOYAL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. JamadarView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay allowed MIDC's writ petition challenging the rejection of its application to amend additional written statements in the underlying civil suit against Vikas Mamanchand Goyal. The court quashed the lower court's rejection order, holding that amendments to pleadings must be considered liberally as defendants are entitled to raise additional and alternative defences with minimal prejudice risk to plaintiffs. MIDC was granted four weeks to file amended additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice N. J. Jamadar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5891/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed MIDC's writ petition challenging the rejection of its application to amend additional written statements in the underlying civil suit against Vikas Mamanchand Goyal. The court quashed the lower court's rejection order, holding that amendments to pleadings must be considered liberally as defendants are entitled to raise additional and alternative defences with minimal prejudice risk to plaintiffs. MIDC was granted four weeks to file amended additional written statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case