PUSHPA D/O NARAYAN PARATE @ PUSHPA W/O SURESH KITADIKAR vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT AND ANR — IA/7238/2024
Case under S.c. & S.t. Orders (Amendment) Act Section 226. Disposed: --Disposed Off on 05th May 2026.
CNR: HCBM010161472024
Filing Number
IA/9218/2024
Filing Date
26-03-2024
Registration No
IA/7238/2024
Registration Date
28-03-2024
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
05th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
PUSHPA D/O NARAYAN PARATE @ PUSHPA W/O SURESH KITADIKAR
Adv. Yeramwar sushant chandrakantrao
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA GENERAL ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT AND ANR
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
FOR CIRCULATION
INTERIM APPLICATION
FOR ORDERS (IA)
FOR ORDERS (IA)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-04-2024 | FOR CIRCULATION |
| 17-01-2025 | INTERIM APPLICATION |
| 13-12-2024 | FOR ORDERS (IA) |
| 06-12-2024 | FOR ORDERS (IA) |
Orders
Case Summary: IA/7238/2024 The Bombay High Court disposed of a teacher's writ petition challenging her termination from Deccan Education Society, Pune, after the petitioner and the education society reached a settlement agreement. Although the State argued it would not pay the petitioner's salary since she lacked a valid Scheduled Tribe certificate for the reserved post she originally occupied, the court declined to examine the merits of either the settlement terms or the State's position, disposing of the petition based on the parties' joint request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: IA/7238/2024 The Bombay High Court disposed of a teacher's writ petition challenging her termination from Deccan Education Society, Pune, after the petitioner and the education society reached a settlement agreement. Although the State argued it would not pay the petitioner's salary since she lacked a valid Scheduled Tribe certificate for the reserved post she originally occupied, the court declined to examine the merits of either the settlement terms or the State's position, disposing of the petition based on the parties' joint request. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts