NARESH BALARAM PATIL vs DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OP SOCIETIES AND ORS — HCBM10161142026
Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010161142026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9305/2026
Filing Date
01-04-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Category
ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )
Sub-Category
Cooperative Socities ( 103 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NARESH BALARAM PATIL
Adv. Prashant P Kulkarni
Respondent(s)
DIVISIONAL JOINT REGISTRAR CO-OP SOCIETIES AND ORS
DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETES
THE NARESH CHSL
SHRINATH CONSTRUCTION
RAJU MAHADU BANA
SMITA SHANKAR SHELAR
NARESH M. PANDHAR
SHANTA BABURAV PATIL
SUBHASH S. MALAVADKAR
JITENDRA BABAN KOLATE
SUMITRA A. PAWAR
VINAYAK S. KERKAR
LINA NILESH YADAV
SUNITA S. WAGHMARE
BHAIRU R. ZURALE
NAVNATH BHAGVAN RASKAR
USHA MOHAN GAIKWAD
SATYVAN R. SARANG
ANJANA BHASKAR PANDAGALE
SHYAM ANAND PAWAR
TARABAI B. PATIL
VASANTI PRABHAKAR BHOIR
GIRISH GURUNATH JOSHI
MANASI SUNIL PATIL
AKSHAD SUNIL PATIL
RAMESH BALARAM PATIL
SANGITA SUNIL PATIL
THE MINISTER CORPORATION AND PANAN DEPARTMENT
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
In Writ Petition No. 9305 of 2026, petitioner Naresh Balaram Patil failed to remove office objections by the April 23/24, 2026 deadline. The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, cautioning that failure to remove objections would result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Writ Petition No. 9305 of 2026, petitioner Naresh Balaram Patil failed to remove office objections by the April 23/24, 2026 deadline. The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, cautioning that failure to remove objections would result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts