SAGAR SANJAY SAKAT vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1552/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010161062026
Filing Number
BA/6807/2026
Filing Date
01-Apr-2026
Registration No
BA/1552/2026
Registration Date
01-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
Bench Type
Single
Category
BAIL ( 51 )
Sub-Category
Regular ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 27-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAGAR SANJAY SAKAT
Adv. Ishan Paradkar
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
Summary: BA/1552/2026 - Sagar Sanjay Sakat v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court granted bail to Sagar Sanjay Sakat, the alleged manager of Pranav Lodge charged with forced prostitution under BNS 2023 and PITA 1956. The court approved bail considering he had been imprisoned for nearly two months, investigation was nearly complete, and he had no criminal antecedents, despite prosecution arguments about absconding risk. He was released on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
For Passing Order
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission (Bail Applications)
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige
-
06-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. BA/1552/2026
Summary: BA/1552/2026 - Sagar Sanjay Sakat v. State of Maharashtra The Bombay High Court granted bail to Sagar Sanjay Sakat, the alleged manager of Pranav Lodge charged with forced prostitution under BNS 2023 and PITA 1956. The court approved bail considering he had been imprisoned for nearly two months, investigation was nearly complete, and he had no criminal antecedents, despite prosecution arguments about absconding risk. He was released on a Rs. 30,000 personal recognizance bond with sureties and conditions prohibiting evidence tampering or witness contact. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts