RANI W/O SUNEEL GILDA AND ORS vs THE COMPETNT AUTHORITY AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — HCBM10160972026

Case under Indian Railways Act,1890. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010160972026

Filing Number

WP/9291/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Railways Act,1890

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RANI W/O SUNEEL GILDA AND ORS

    Adv. Abhijeet F Khade

  2. 2.UMESH S/O OM PAPRUNIYA

  3. 3.OMPRAKASH S/O RAMKISHAN BHANDARI

  4. 4.ANJALI W/O OMPRAKASH BHANDARI

  5. 5.UJWALA W/O MANOJ LANDGE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE COMPETNT AUTHORITY AND SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION)

  3. 3.THE ABITRATOR AND ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9291 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned the case and granted a two-week extension to the petitioners and their advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 4th May 2026. The court noted that while Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) permits refusal of registration for failure to remove objections, it deemed it appropriate to provide one additional opportunity. If objections remain unremoved within two weeks, the Registrar will pass an order refusing registration per the applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9291 of 2026 – Bombay High Court The Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned the case and granted a two-week extension to the petitioners and their advocate to remove office objections that were previously notified on 4th May 2026. The court noted that while Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) permits refusal of registration for failure to remove objections, it deemed it appropriate to provide one additional opportunity. If objections remain unremoved within two weeks, the Registrar will pass an order refusing registration per the applicable rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case