SHRI. DURGAIAH KOMURAVELLI VANEET KHOSLA vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - T J PANDIAN, RESPONDENTS — FA/490/2016

Case under Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010160972015

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

09th September 2019

Filing Number

FA/10700/2015

Filing Date

30-03-2015

Registration No

FA/490/2016

Registration Date

01-04-2016

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23

Petitioner(s)

SHRI. DURGAIAH KOMURAVELLI VANEET KHOSLA

SMT. BUCHAVVA KOMURAVELLI

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA Advocate - T J PANDIAN, RESPONDENTS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

09-09-2019

FOR ADMISSION - FRESH CIVIL SIDE MATTERS

15-04-2026

AT 4.00 P.M.

09-04-2026

AT 4.00 P.M.

22-09-2025

FOR ADMISSION

18-08-2025

FOR ADMISSION

Orders

09-07-2015
15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE JITENDRA SHANTILAL JAIN

The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal and held that the deceased's death while traveling on a valid railway ticket constituted an "untoward incident" under Section 123 of the Railways Act, 1989. The court found the deceased was a bonafide passenger and, in the absence of any eyewitness testimony from the Railways to prove he was crossing tracks, applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the claimants based on circumstantial evidence. The mother of the deceased is awarded compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs, payable within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay allowed the appeal and held that the deceased's death while traveling on a valid railway ticket constituted an "untoward incident" under Section 123 of the Railways Act, 1989. The court found the deceased was a bonafide passenger and, in the absence of any eyewitness testimony from the Railways to prove he was crossing tracks, applied the benefit of doubt in favor of the claimants based on circumstantial evidence. The mother of the deceased is awarded compensation of Rs. 4 lakhs, payable within eight weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case