DR MUKHTAR AHMED BABALAL AND ANR vs NATASHA ENCLAVE COOOPERTIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS — HCBM10160602026

Case under Bombay Public Trust Act. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Next hearing 15-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010160602026

Filing Number

WP/9262/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

RELIGIOUS/CHARITABLE ENDOWMWNTS AND PUBLIC TRUST ( 33 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Public Trust Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DR MUKHTAR AHMED BABALAL AND ANR

    Adv. Parag Vinay Deshpande

  2. 2.MRS. FATIMA SAYYED SHAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NATASHA ENCLAVE COOOPERTIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LTD AND ORS

  2. 2.CITY SURVEY OFFICER, CIRCLE 2, PUNE CITY

  3. 3.THE SUB REGISTRAR, HAVELI NO. 20

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioners two weeks to remove office objections to their Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9262 of 2026. The petitioners and their advocate had previously failed to remove the objections after initial notification on 4 May 2026. If objections are not cured within the extended two-week period, the petition's registration will be refused under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted the petitioners two weeks to remove office objections to their Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9262 of 2026. The petitioners and their advocate had previously failed to remove the objections after initial notification on 4 May 2026. If objections are not cured within the extended two-week period, the petition's registration will be refused under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case