Ramesh Mangilal Jain vs Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance — HCBM10160012026

Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section Article19and21. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010160012026

e-Filing Number

30-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/9260/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section Article19and21

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Mangilal Jain

    Adv. Atul Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance

  2. 2.Additional Commissioner of CGST and CEx Mumbai Central

  3. 3.Assistant Commissioner Anti Evasion, CGST and CEx, Thane

  4. 4.Devchand Velji Shah Proprietor of Noble Corporation

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Summary Ramesh Mangilal Jain's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9260 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to remove these objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Summary Ramesh Mangilal Jain's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9260 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to remove these objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case