Ramesh Mangilal Jain vs Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance — HCBM10160012026
Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section Article19and21. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010160012026
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/9260/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ramesh Mangilal Jain
Adv. Atul Singh
Respondent(s)
Union of India Through the Secretary, Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
Additional Commissioner of CGST and CEx Mumbai Central
Assistant Commissioner Anti Evasion, CGST and CEx, Thane
Devchand Velji Shah Proprietor of Noble Corporation
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 24-06-2026 | FOR ORDERS (OBJECTION NOT REMOVED) |
Orders
Summary Ramesh Mangilal Jain's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9260 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to remove these objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary Ramesh Mangilal Jain's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9260 of 2026 before the Bombay High Court was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections within the stipulated time. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to remove these objections, warning that failure to do so will result in refusal of registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts