Siddharth Carbochem Products Limited PDS LEGAL vs The Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance AND ORS — WP/5583/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010159982026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/9257/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5583/2026
Registration Date
22-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Siddharth Carbochem Products Limited PDS LEGAL
Respondent(s)
The Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance AND ORS
The Commissioner of Customs NS II Imports
The Additional Director General of Foreign Trade
The Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade
The Appraising Officer Import Group III
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SUMAN SHYAM , HON'BLE JUSTICE ADVAIT M. SETHNA
FOR CIRCULATION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-06-2026 | FOR CIRCULATION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of Siddharth Carbochem's writ petition challenging the Customs authorities' inaction on reassessing four bills of entry. The court directed the respondents to complete reassessment within eight weeks per relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents, with no coercive action until completion, but left the petitioner's interest waiver claim to the authorities' discretion during reassessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of Siddharth Carbochem's writ petition challenging the Customs authorities' inaction on reassessing four bills of entry. The court directed the respondents to complete reassessment within eight weeks per relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents, with no coercive action until completion, but left the petitioner's interest waiver claim to the authorities' discretion during reassessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts