Siddharth Carbochem Products Limited PDS LEGAL vs The Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance AND ORS — WP/5583/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 09th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010159982026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/9257/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/5583/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
Bench Type
Division
Category
INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
09-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Siddharth Carbochem Products Limited PDS LEGAL
Respondent(s)
-
1.The Union of India Through the Secretary Department of Revenue Ministry of Finance AND ORS
-
2.The Commissioner of Customs NS II Imports
-
3.The Additional Director General of Foreign Trade
-
4.The Assistant Director General of Foreign Trade
-
5.The Appraising Officer Import Group III
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam,hon'ble Justice Advait M. SethnaView PDF
The Bombay High Court disposed of Siddharth Carbochem's writ petition challenging the Customs authorities' inaction on reassessing four bills of entry. The court directed the respondents to complete reassessment within eight weeks per relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents, with no coercive action until completion, but left the petitioner's interest waiver claim to the authorities' discretion during reassessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
For Circulation
Hon'ble Shri Justice Suman Shyam , Hon'ble Justice Advait M. Sethna
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5583/2026
The Bombay High Court disposed of Siddharth Carbochem's writ petition challenging the Customs authorities' inaction on reassessing four bills of entry. The court directed the respondents to complete reassessment within eight weeks per relevant Supreme Court and High Court precedents, with no coercive action until completion, but left the petitioner's interest waiver claim to the authorities' discretion during reassessment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts