SMT INDUBAI RAMNATH SHINDE vs UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY — FA/575/2026

Case under Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010159432026

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

Filing Number

FA/9220/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

FA/575/2026

Registration Date

21-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Coram

HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Bench Type

Single

Category

FIRST APPEAL ( 53 )

Sub-Category

Other Appeals - Single Bench ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Railway Claim Tribunal Act Section 23

Petitioner(s)

SMT INDUBAI RAMNATH SHINDE

Adv. vaneet khosla

Respondent(s)

UNION OF INDIA THR GENERAL MANAGER CENTRAL RAILWAY

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

12-06-2026

FRESH MATTERS AUTO LISTED

Orders

12-06-2026
HON'BLE JUSTICE SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH

Case FA/575/2026 Summary: In this railway accident claim appeal filed by Smt Indubai Ramnath Shinde against the Union of India (Central Railway), the Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 6th July 2026. The court directed the appellant's advocate to serve the respondent through private notice via all possible modes and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case FA/575/2026 Summary: In this railway accident claim appeal filed by Smt Indubai Ramnath Shinde against the Union of India (Central Railway), the Bombay High Court issued notice to the respondent returnable on 6th July 2026. The court directed the appellant's advocate to serve the respondent through private notice via all possible modes and file an affidavit of service before the next hearing date. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case