SUNITA W/O HANMANT GAWALI vs THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS ) CENTRAL RAILWAY SOLAPUR AND ORS — HCBM10158842026

Case under Indian Railways Act,1890. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010158842026

Filing Number

WP/9189/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Railways Act,1890

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUNITA W/O HANMANT GAWALI

    Adv. Abhijeet F Khade

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTIONS ) CENTRAL RAILWAY SOLAPUR AND ORS

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY CHIEF ENGINEER (CONSTRUCTION), CENTRAL RAILWAY, BHUSAWAL

  3. 3.THE RAILWAY MINISTRY, CENTRAL RAILWAY

  4. 4.THE COLLECTOR SOLAPUR

  5. 5.THE ARBITRATOR AND ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER,PUNE DIVISION

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9189 of 2026 filed by Sunita W/O Hanmant Gawali against Railway officials was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 29th April 2026. The Registrar granted two weeks' additional time to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9189 of 2026 filed by Sunita W/O Hanmant Gawali against Railway officials was adjourned. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections after being notified on 29th April 2026. The Registrar granted two weeks' additional time to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case