M/S GS E-COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED PVT. LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA THRO. THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE — HCBM10158622026

Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010158622026

Filing Number

WP/9177/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )

Sub-Category

GST GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Service Tax Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S GS E-COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED PVT. LTD.

    Adv. Kartik Vig

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THRO. THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9177 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted GS E-Commerce Private Limited a two-week extension to cure office objections that had not been removed by the notification deadline of April 30, 2026. The Registrar exercised discretion to provide an additional opportunity rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, warning that failure to rectify objections within two weeks would result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9177 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted GS E-Commerce Private Limited a two-week extension to cure office objections that had not been removed by the notification deadline of April 30, 2026. The Registrar exercised discretion to provide an additional opportunity rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, warning that failure to rectify objections within two weeks would result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case