M/S GS E-COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED PVT. LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA THRO. THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE — HCBM10158622026
Case under Central Goods and Service Tax Act. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010158622026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9177/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
DIRECT TAXES ( 10 )
Sub-Category
GST GOODS AND SERVICES TAX ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S GS E-COMMERCE PRIVATE LIMITED PVT. LTD.
Adv. Kartik Vig
Respondent(s)
UNION OF INDIA THRO. THE SECRETARY DEPT. OF REVENUE
ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER
ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9177 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted GS E-Commerce Private Limited a two-week extension to cure office objections that had not been removed by the notification deadline of April 30, 2026. The Registrar exercised discretion to provide an additional opportunity rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, warning that failure to rectify objections within two weeks would result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 9177 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted GS E-Commerce Private Limited a two-week extension to cure office objections that had not been removed by the notification deadline of April 30, 2026. The Registrar exercised discretion to provide an additional opportunity rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, warning that failure to rectify objections within two weeks would result in refusal of registration. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts