PRADEEP RADHARAMAN LADIWAL vs COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES — WP/6452/2026

Case under Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section na. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 11th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010158552026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/9173/2026

Filing Date

30-03-2026

Registration No

WP/6452/2026

Registration Date

06-05-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

11th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Ownership Flats Act Section na

Petitioner(s)

PRADEEP RADHARAMAN LADIWAL

Adv. SANTOSH SITAP

DEVENDRA RADHARAM LADIWAL

Respondent(s)

COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND DISTRICT DEPUTY REGISTRAR CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES

CHAIRMAN /SECRETARY SAI GURUPRASAD CO-OP. HOUSING SOC. LTD.

BOBUN BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS MORYA SHOPPING CENTRE

KALINDI PRASAD SHRIVASTAV

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. MINISTRY OF CO-OP. AFFAIRS

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

30-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

11-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

11-06-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition challenging the deemed conveyance certificate issued to Sai Guruprasad Co-op. Housing Society under MOFA Act, 1963. The court held that a deemed conveyance certificate does not adjudicate final title rights and reserved the petitioners' liberty to file an independent suit to establish their ownership claim, with the certificate remaining subject to any favorable decree they obtain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court disposed of the petition challenging the deemed conveyance certificate issued to Sai Guruprasad Co-op. Housing Society under MOFA Act, 1963. The court held that a deemed conveyance certificate does not adjudicate final title rights and reserved the petitioners' liberty to file an independent suit to establish their ownership claim, with the certificate remaining subject to any favorable decree they obtain. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Mah. Ownership Flats Act All acts →

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case