SAU. SUVARNA VIKRAM MORE AND ORS vs SHRI VIKRAM MADHAVRAO MORE Advocate - jyoti bajpayee, R. NO. 1 — WP/6215/2016

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order). Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Jul-2016

CNR: HCBM010158162016

Filing Number

WP/10472/2016

Filing Date

05-Apr-2016

Registration No

WP/6215/2016

Registration Date

09-Jun-2016

Judge

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Coram

Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri Godse

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 27-May-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SAU. SUVARNA VIKRAM MORE AND ORS

    Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi

  2. 2.KUMARI SUKHADA VIKRAM MORE

  3. 3.KUMARI SHIVANI VIKRAM MORE

  4. 4.KUMAR ADITYA VIKRAM MORE, MINOR, THROUGH HIS MOTHER SAU. SUVARNA VIKRAM MORE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SHRI VIKRAM MADHAVRAO MORE Advocate - jyoti bajpayee, R. NO. 1

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Ms. Justice Gauri GodseView PDF

    The High Court of Bombay dismissed three consolidated writ petitions as infructuous on April 17, 2026. The court found that during the pendency of the petitions, the underlying execution application was dismissed and Darkhast proceedings were closed, rendering the petitions moot. Since all petitions arose from the same execution proceedings, the court disposed of them accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Dec-2020

    Due For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice A.S. Gadkari

  4. 02-Apr-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. SonakView PDF

  5. 02-Apr-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice M.S. Sonak

  6. 01-Mar-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  7. 01-Mar-2019

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  8. 25-Jan-2019

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  9. 25-Jan-2019

    For Admission - Fresh CIVIL Side Matters

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  10. 28-Nov-2017

    For Circulation CIVIL Side

    Hon'ble Smt. Justice S.S. Jadhav

  11. 25-Sep-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  12. 25-Sep-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  13. 18-Aug-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  14. 18-Aug-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  15. 11-Jul-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  16. 11-Jul-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  17. 05-Jun-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  18. 05-Jun-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  19. 31-Mar-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  20. 31-Mar-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  21. 23-Feb-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  22. 23-Feb-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  23. 18-Jan-2017

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  24. 18-Jan-2017

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  25. 22-Dec-2016

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  26. 22-Dec-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  27. 16-Nov-2016

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  28. 16-Nov-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  29. 05-Oct-2016

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  30. 05-Oct-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  31. 30-Aug-2016

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)View PDF

  32. 30-Aug-2016

    For Orders

    Registrar (Judicial - Iwp)

  33. 02-Aug-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  34. 02-Aug-2016

    For Orders [Civil Side Matters]

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. Tated

  35. 08-Jul-2016

    Hon'ble Shri Justice K.K. TatedView PDF

  36. 08-Jul-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 05-Apr-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6215/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Bombay dismissed three consolidated writ petitions as infructuous on April 17, 2026. The court found that during the pendency of the petitions, the underlying execution application was dismissed and Darkhast proceedings were closed, rendering the petitions moot. Since all petitions arose from the same execution proceedings, the court disposed of them accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case