SURESH BHORU KOKANE vs THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE — WP/6006/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010158052026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9151/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP/6006/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SURESH BHORU KOKANE
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
VASANT BHORU KOKANE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE
THE COLLECTOR NASHIK
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/6006/2026 The High Court of Bombay admitted petitions challenging rejection of objections by the Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik regarding land acquisition for an industrial estate. The Court found prima facie that the SDO failed to adequately discuss petitioners' grievances and violated prior court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat inputs. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/6006/2026 The High Court of Bombay admitted petitions challenging rejection of objections by the Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik regarding land acquisition for an industrial estate. The Court found prima facie that the SDO failed to adequately discuss petitioners' grievances and violated prior court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat inputs. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts