SURESH BHORU KOKANE vs THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE — WP/6006/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Status: High On Board -. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

High On Board - Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010158052026

Filing Number

WP/9151/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/6006/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SURESH BHORU KOKANE

    Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE

  2. 2.VASANT BHORU KOKANE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICE

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR NASHIK

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Adv. Jay and Co

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/6006/2026 The High Court of Bombay admitted petitions challenging rejection of objections by the Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik regarding land acquisition for an industrial estate. The Court found prima facie that the SDO failed to adequately discuss petitioners' grievances and violated prior court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat inputs. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6006/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/6006/2026 The High Court of Bombay admitted petitions challenging rejection of objections by the Sub-divisional Officer, Nashik regarding land acquisition for an industrial estate. The Court found prima facie that the SDO failed to adequately discuss petitioners' grievances and violated prior court directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat inputs. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case