TRIMBAK DHONDU SHELAR vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5985/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010158032026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9149/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5985/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TRIMBAK DHONDU SHELAR
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR NASHIK
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES TO BE SERVED THR. AGP
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
The High Court of Bombay issued a notice returnable on 16.06.2026 in WP/5985/2026 and related petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's rejection of objections to land acquisition. The Court granted ad-interim status quo relief regarding possession and mutation entries, finding the SDO prima facie failed to discuss petitioners' grievances in detail and did not comply with previous court directions requiring consideration of Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The High Court of Bombay issued a notice returnable on 16.06.2026 in WP/5985/2026 and related petitions challenging the Sub-Divisional Officer's rejection of objections to land acquisition. The Court granted ad-interim status quo relief regarding possession and mutation entries, finding the SDO prima facie failed to discuss petitioners' grievances in detail and did not comply with previous court directions requiring consideration of Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts