VITTHAL KISAN GAIKWAD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY — WP/4594/2026
Case under The Maharashtra Zilla Parishads and Panchayat Samitis Act,1961 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.
CNR: HCBM010157922026
Filing Number
WP/9142/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP/4594/2026
Registration Date
08-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
Bench Type
Division
Category
OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )
Sub-Category
TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Decision Date
30th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VITTHAL KISAN GAIKWAD
Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar
SUNIL PANDHARINATH CHAVAN
BHAUSAHEB JAGANNATH WANAVE
AMBADAS ASHRU NARUTE
SUKHADEV SITARAM KALE
RAMESH RAMHARI GAWADE
VIJAYKUMAR BALKRISHNA NAGARE
RAMKRISHNA MAHADEO YEKALE
WAMANRAO RAJARAM SATPUTE
SAVLERAM BHAGUJI LANDAGE
ROHIDAS BAJIRAO KALE
DIPAK JANARDAN MORE
MANOJ PANDURANG KADADHEKAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. THE SECRETARY
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR THE SECRETARY
THE DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION (PRIMARY)
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION, PUNE REGION
THE DIVISIONAL COMMISSIONER, PUNE REGION, PUNE
THE ZILLA PARISHAD PUNE THR ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER
THE EDUCATION OFFICER (PRIMARY)
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE HITEN SHAMRAO VENEGAVKAR
URGENT ADMISSION
FOR DISPOSAL
URGENT ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-04-2026 | URGENT ADMISSION |
| 30-04-2026 | FOR DISPOSAL |
| 17-04-2026 | URGENT ADMISSION |
Orders
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions. The court found that the petitioners had selectively filtered information provided to their counsel and noted that an identical petition on the same facts had already been rejected by the court in a previous case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition as withdrawn on the petitioners' instructions. The court found that the petitioners had selectively filtered information provided to their counsel and noted that an identical petition on the same facts had already been rejected by the court in a previous case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts