SHIV KRUPA STEEL ALLOYS PVT LTD vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM10157332026

Case under Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section Article226. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010157332026

e-Filing Number

27-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/9111/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

INDIRECT TAXES ( 17 )

Sub-Category

GST Goods and Services Tax ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Central Goods and Services Tax Act,2017 Section Article226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHIV KRUPA STEEL ALLOYS PVT LTD

    Adv. PRATHIBHA NAMBOODIRI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX BELAPUR

  4. 4.STATE TAX OFFICER

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9111 of 2026 by Shiv Krupa Steel Alloys Pvt Ltd against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the notification date of April 27, 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9111 of 2026 by Shiv Krupa Steel Alloys Pvt Ltd against the State of Maharashtra was adjourned. The petitioner failed to remove office objections by the notification date of April 27, 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects, warning that failure to comply will result in refusal of registration under the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case