RAMJI MADEVA PATEL (SINCE DECEASED) THRO. LRS.(Legal Heir) vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — HCBM10157212026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010157212026
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9104/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RAMJI MADEVA PATEL (SINCE DECEASED) THRO. LRS.(Legal Heir)
Adv. Raju Suryawanshi 1.
SAVITA RAMJI PATEL1.
RAMESH RAMJI PATEL THR. THEIR POWER OF HOLDER BECHAR BAU PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS, COLLECTOR COMPOUND
THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER THANE
THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
THANE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. ITS COMMISSIONER
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9104 of 2026 filed by Ramji Madeva Patel's legal heirs and others against the State of Maharashtra and land record officials was adjourned. The petitioners failed to remove office objections within the initial notification period (30 April 2026). The Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in dismissal of the petition under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9104 of 2026 filed by Ramji Madeva Patel's legal heirs and others against the State of Maharashtra and land record officials was adjourned. The petitioners failed to remove office objections within the initial notification period (30 April 2026). The Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in dismissal of the petition under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts