RAMJI MADEVA PATEL (SINCE DECEASED) THRO. LRS.(Legal Heir) vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY — HCBM10157212026
Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010157212026
Filing Number
WP/9104/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Single
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMJI MADEVA PATEL (SINCE DECEASED) THRO. LRS.(Legal Heir)
Adv. Raju Suryawanshi 1.
-
2.SAVITA RAMJI PATEL1.
-
3.RAMESH RAMJI PATEL THR. THEIR POWER OF HOLDER BECHAR BAU PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRO. ITS ADDITIONAL PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
-
2.THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF LAND RECORDS, COLLECTOR COMPOUND
-
3.THE CITY SURVEY OFFICER THANE
-
4.THE DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF LAND RECORDS
-
5.THANE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THR. ITS COMMISSIONER
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9104 of 2026 filed by Ramji Madeva Patel's legal heirs and others against the State of Maharashtra and land record officials was adjourned. The petitioners failed to remove office objections within the initial notification period (30 April 2026). The Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in dismissal of the petition under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Objections To Be Removed
Assistant Registrar
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 9104 of 2026 filed by Ramji Madeva Patel's legal heirs and others against the State of Maharashtra and land record officials was adjourned. The petitioners failed to remove office objections within the initial notification period (30 April 2026). The Registrar granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in dismissal of the petition under Rule 3(iii), Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts