CSB BANK LTD vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS — WP/5127/2026
Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section na. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010157162026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/9101/2026
Filing Date
30-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5127/2026
Registration Date
17-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CSB BANK LTD
Adv. Alok D Mishra
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THRU G P AND ORS
MINAL KANERI, ADVOCATE COMMISSIONER
CHANDERLATA GOSAI
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR COMPLIANCE
FOR ORDERS-
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 10-06-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
| 28-04-2026 | FOR ORDERS- |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5127/2026 Outcome: Petition allowed with directions issued. The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner (Respondent No. 2) to immediately take physical possession of a mortgaged flat on 11/05/2026 with police assistance from Maharashtra State (Respondent No. 1). The court rejected the Commissioner's claim of having "surrendered" her rights, holding that once appointed under SARFAESI Act Section 14, the Commissioner's mandate continues until possession is obtained. The case is listed for compliance on 10th June 2026, with a warning that the Senior Police Inspector must appear personally if directions are not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5127/2026 Outcome: Petition allowed with directions issued. The Bombay High Court directed the Court Commissioner (Respondent No. 2) to immediately take physical possession of a mortgaged flat on 11/05/2026 with police assistance from Maharashtra State (Respondent No. 1). The court rejected the Commissioner's claim of having "surrendered" her rights, holding that once appointed under SARFAESI Act Section 14, the Commissioner's mandate continues until possession is obtained. The case is listed for compliance on 10th June 2026, with a warning that the Senior Police Inspector must appear personally if directions are not followed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts