KUNAL JIWARAJKA AND ORS vs UNION BANK OF INDIA — WP/6881/2026

Case under Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 12th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010155642026

Filing Number

WP/9002/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/6881/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )

Sub-Category

MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

12-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Securitisation & Reconstruction of Finiancial Assets Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNAL JIWARAJKA AND ORS

    Adv. Link legal

  2. 2.LAXMIDEVI JIWARAJKA

  3. 3.SAKSHI JIWARAJKA

  4. 4.ASSOCIATED ELECTRICAL AGENCIES

  5. 5.JSK POPMART LLP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION BANK OF INDIA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary of WP/6881/2026: The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a DRT order that rejected their interim application to restrain Union Bank from taking physical possession of mortgaged properties. The court held that the petitioners had an adequate statutory remedy—appeal to DRAT under Section 18 of the Securitisation Act—and found they were attempting to circumvent the mandatory pre-deposit requirement by approaching the writ court instead, despite a ten-month delay in filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/6881/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP/6881/2026: The Bombay High Court dismissed the petitioners' writ petition challenging a DRT order that rejected their interim application to restrain Union Bank from taking physical possession of mortgaged properties. The court held that the petitioners had an adequate statutory remedy—appeal to DRAT under Section 18 of the Securitisation Act—and found they were attempting to circumvent the mandatory pre-deposit requirement by approaching the writ court instead, despite a ten-month delay in filing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case