KUNDALIK ALIAS PUNDLIK MAHADU ARINGALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS — HCBM10155592026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010155592026

Filing Number

WP/9000/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

TOWN PLANNING MATTERS INCLUDING MATTERS RELATING TO RESERVATION,TOWN PLANNING SCHEMES ( 4 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 14-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KUNDALIK ALIAS PUNDLIK MAHADU ARINGALE

    Adv. Parag Tilak

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS SECRETARY AND ORS

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final opportunity to petitioner Kundalik Alias Pundlik Mahadu Aringale and his advocate to remove procedural office objections within two weeks (by 26/06/2026). The petition had been notified for removing objections on 30th April 2026 but remained uncured. If objections are not remedied within this extension period, the Registrar will refuse registration of the writ petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final opportunity to petitioner Kundalik Alias Pundlik Mahadu Aringale and his advocate to remove procedural office objections within two weeks (by 26/06/2026). The petition had been notified for removing objections on 30th April 2026 but remained uncured. If objections are not remedied within this extension period, the Registrar will refuse registration of the writ petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case