UTKARSH PANDEY vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS AND ORS — HCBM10155052026
Case under Maharashtra Unaided Private Professional Educational Institutes(regulation of Admission and Fees)act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010155052026
Filing Number
WP/8975/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
EDUCATION ( 11 )
Sub-Category
PROFESSIONAL COURSES ( 16 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 14-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.UTKARSH PANDEY
Adv. M V Thorat
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS DEPARTMENT OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUGS AND ORS
-
2.DIRECTOR OF MEDICAL EDUCATION AND RESEARCH
-
3.ADMISSION REGULATORY AUTHORITY
-
4.NATIONAL MEDICAL COMMISSION
-
5.STATE CET CELL THR. ITS COMMISSIONER
-
6.VEDANTAA INSTITUTE OF MEDICAL SCIENCE THR. ITS DEAN
-
7.TERNA MEDICAL COLLAGE
Case History
-
12-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Jun-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary Utkarsh Pandey's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8975 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra was adjudged procedurally defective for failing to remove office objections by the April 30, 2026 deadline. The Bombay High Court Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; if not remedied, the petition registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Objections To Be Removed
Assistant Registrar
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary Utkarsh Pandey's Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8975 of 2026 against the State of Maharashtra was adjudged procedurally defective for failing to remove office objections by the April 30, 2026 deadline. The Bombay High Court Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; if not remedied, the petition registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts