CHAYA DATTU GUNJAL vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5853/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010154972026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8968/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5853/2026
Registration Date
28-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHAYA DATTU GUNJAL
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 05-05-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5853/2026 - Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik The petitioners challenged SDO orders (dated 22.02.2026) rejecting their objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with its earlier directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5853/2026 - Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik The petitioners challenged SDO orders (dated 22.02.2026) rejecting their objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with its earlier directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts