CHAYA DATTU GUNJAL vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5853/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Status: High On Board -. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010154972026
Filing Number
WP/8968/2026
Filing Date
27-Mar-2026
Registration No
WP/5853/2026
Registration Date
28-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Coram
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.CHAYA DATTU GUNJAL
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
-
2.THE COLLECTOR
-
3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES
Case History
-
16-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
16-Jun-2026
High On Board -
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat
-
05-May-2026
Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF
Case Summary: WP/5853/2026 - Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik The petitioners challenged SDO orders (dated 22.02.2026) rejecting their objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with its earlier directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
05-May-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. WP/5853/2026
Case Summary: WP/5853/2026 - Chaya Dattu Gunjal v. Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik The petitioners challenged SDO orders (dated 22.02.2026) rejecting their objections to land acquisition for an industrial estate under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. The court found the SDO prima facie failed to comply with its earlier directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input. The petition was adjourned to 16.06.2026, with status quo maintained on possession and mutation entries as interim relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts