MANISHA VIDYANAND SHINDE AND ORS vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN SEC DEPT OF SCHOOL AND EDU. AND ORS — WP/4052/2026

Case under Right to Education Act 2009 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 16th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010154512026

Filing Number

WP/8933/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/4052/2026

Registration Date

27-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Category

OTHER SERVICE MATTERS ( 66 )

Sub-Category

TEACHING STAFF ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

16-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 24-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Education Act 2009 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANISHA VIDYANAND SHINDE AND ORS

    Adv. Padmaja Malgaonkar

  2. 2.SIMA AJIT PALAV

  3. 3.SUPRIYA RAGHUNATH CHORGHE

  4. 4.BHIVSEN UMAJI GHODE

  5. 5.ANAND DAGDU KAMBLE

  6. 6.BALASAHEB LAXMAN KHUNTE

  7. 7.SANJAY MRULIDHAR DEVADE

  8. 8.SANTOSH RAGHUNATH PUNEKAR

  9. 9.EKNATH VISHNU KHEDKAR

  10. 10.SANTOSH GULABRAO BHALERAO

  11. 11.KALPNA MAYAJI KUMBHAR

  12. 12.SHARDA DADASAHEB VIRKAR

  13. 13.ANJALI SANTOSH PUNEKAR

  14. 14.SADHANA SADASHIV KOKATE

  15. 15.NISHA SUNIL GOLANDE

  16. 16.SAHIRABANU ASLAM SHIKALGAR

  17. 17.MUKTA DATTATRAY PAWAR

  18. 18.SUREKHA VILAS MARNE

  19. 19.DATTATRAY YADAVRAO MULIK

  20. 20.RAVINDRAKUMAR RAMCHANDRA GULAVE

  21. 21.SUREKHA SUNIL BHALERAO

  22. 22.MADHAVI DILIP SALAKE

  23. 23.PRATIBHA RAMESH SONAVANE

  24. 24.KUSUM GULAB ERANDE

  25. 25.NAYANA SANDIP BANGAL

  26. 26.KAVITA DNYANDEV SITOLE

  27. 27.KRUSHNA VASANT SAID

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR PRIN SEC DEPT OF SCHOOL AND EDU. AND ORS

  2. 2.PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRO ITS COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION, THRO ITS DEPUTY COMMISSIONER

  4. 4.PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION THRO ITS ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Dr. Manisha Vidyanand Shinde and others, finding that their grievance had been redressed. The Pune Municipal Corporation's Primary Education Department issued a Corrigendum dated April 7, 2026, addressing the petitioners' concerns, and upon submission of this corrigendum and supporting communication to the court, the petitioners' senior advocate confirmed the grievance was resolved, leading to the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Apr-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Part-Heard

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  6. 02-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Part-Heard

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  8. 30-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  9. 30-Mar-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  10. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  11. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4052/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by Dr. Manisha Vidyanand Shinde and others, finding that their grievance had been redressed. The Pune Municipal Corporation's Primary Education Department issued a Corrigendum dated April 7, 2026, addressing the petitioners' concerns, and upon submission of this corrigendum and supporting communication to the court, the petitioners' senior advocate confirmed the grievance was resolved, leading to the petition's disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case