NITIN NIVRUTTI PUNDE AND ORS vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5997/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010154462026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8931/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5997/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
NITIN NIVRUTTI PUNDE AND ORS
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
LANKABAI NIVRUTTI PUNDE
SANTOSH NIVRUTTI PUNDE
SUNIL NIVRUTTI PUNDE
NIVRUTTI SHANKAR PUNDE
Respondent(s)
THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5997/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026. The petitioners challenged the SDO's orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting their objections to land acquisition under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, alleging non-compliance with prior court directions. The court granted ad-interim relief, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to discuss grievances in detail and ignored the directive to consider Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. Status quo regarding possession and mutation entries was maintained pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5997/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026. The petitioners challenged the SDO's orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting their objections to land acquisition under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, alleging non-compliance with prior court directions. The court granted ad-interim relief, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to discuss grievances in detail and ignored the directive to consider Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. Status quo regarding possession and mutation entries was maintained pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts