NITIN NIVRUTTI PUNDE AND ORS vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5997/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Status: High On Board -. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

High On Board - Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010154462026

Filing Number

WP/8931/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5997/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NITIN NIVRUTTI PUNDE AND ORS

    Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE

  2. 2.LANKABAI NIVRUTTI PUNDE

  3. 3.SANTOSH NIVRUTTI PUNDE

  4. 4.SUNIL NIVRUTTI PUNDE

  5. 5.NIVRUTTI SHANKAR PUNDE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Adv. Jay and Co

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THR THE MINISTRY OF INDUSTRIES

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Case Summary: WP/5997/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026. The petitioners challenged the SDO's orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting their objections to land acquisition under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, alleging non-compliance with prior court directions. The court granted ad-interim relief, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to discuss grievances in detail and ignored the directive to consider Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. Status quo regarding possession and mutation entries was maintained pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5997/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: WP/5997/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted the writ petition and issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026. The petitioners challenged the SDO's orders of 22.02.2026 rejecting their objections to land acquisition under Section 32(2) of the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961, alleging non-compliance with prior court directions. The court granted ad-interim relief, finding prima facie that the SDO failed to discuss grievances in detail and ignored the directive to consider Gram Sabha and Panchayat Samiti objections. Status quo regarding possession and mutation entries was maintained pending final hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case