SANTOSH KANTILAL SHELAR AND ANR vs SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS — WP/5971/2026
Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010154382026
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8928/2026
Filing Date
27-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5971/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )
Sub-Category
COMPENSATION ( 8 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SANTOSH KANTILAL SHELAR AND ANR
Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE
VISHRAM KANTILAL SHELAR
Respondent(s)
SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER AND ORS
THE COLLECTOR, NASHIK
THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION
Adv. Jay and Co,Jay and Co
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
HIGH ON BOARD -
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
| 16-06-2026 | HIGH ON BOARD - |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5971/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026 and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries. The court found the Sub-Divisional Officer prima facie failed to comply with prior court directions (dated 01.10.2025) requiring detailed discussion of petitioners' objections and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections before rejecting land acquisition objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5971/2026 The Bombay High Court issued notice returnable on 16.06.2026 and granted ad-interim relief maintaining status quo on possession and mutation entries. The court found the Sub-Divisional Officer prima facie failed to comply with prior court directions (dated 01.10.2025) requiring detailed discussion of petitioners' objections and consideration of Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti objections before rejecting land acquisition objections under the Maharashtra Industrial Development Act, 1961. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts