MOHD ANWAR MOHD RAHAMANI vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — WP/4142/2026

Case under Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010154202026

Filing Number

WP/8921/2026

Filing Date

27-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/4142/2026

Registration Date

30-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Cooperative Socities ( 103 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Co-op. Soc. Act Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MOHD ANWAR MOHD RAHAMANI

    Adv. V B GHORPADE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

  2. 2.SPECIAL RECOVERY OFFICER

  3. 3.DY. REGISTRAR CO. OP. SOC.

  4. 4.DIST. DY. REGISTRAR, CO.OP.(

  5. 5., MUMBAI

  6. 6.SHIVKRUPA SAHAKARI PATHPEDHI LTD.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit BorkarView PDF

    Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice of attachment dated January 17, 2026. The court held that since the notice merely calls upon the petitioner to deposit a specified amount and is not an actual attachment order, it cannot be challenged through a writ petition at this stage. The petitioner retains the right to pursue available legal remedies if the Society proceeds with actual property attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Circulation

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Amit Borkar

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/4142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petition challenging a notice of attachment dated January 17, 2026. The court held that since the notice merely calls upon the petitioner to deposit a specified amount and is not an actual attachment order, it cannot be challenged through a writ petition at this stage. The petitioner retains the right to pursue available legal remedies if the Society proceeds with actual property attachment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case