KARAN SUDHIR BHATT (DESIGNATED PARTNER OF M/S VILLA REALCON LLP vs CHANDRESH PARBAT GOTHI — HCBM10152852026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104. Next hearing: 09th June 2026.

Next hearing 09-Jun-2026

CNR: HCBM010152852026

Filing Number

AO/8838/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Coram

Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

Bench Type

Single

Category

CIVIL APPEALS ( 45 )

Sub-Category

Single Bench Matters ( 2 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 104

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KARAN SUDHIR BHATT (DESIGNATED PARTNER OF M/S VILLA REALCON LLP

    Adv. Law Counsellors

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHANDRESH PARBAT GOTHI

  2. 2.ABHIJEET PRABHAKAR JAIL

  3. 3.M/S D SILVA CORPORATION THR PROPRIETOR MR JAMES PASCAL D SILVA

  4. 4.M/S VILLA REALCON LLP THR ITS PARTNERS

  5. 5.PRABHULAL KHETSHI PATEL (PARTNER M/S. VILLA REALCON LLP

  6. 6.LALJI AKHAI BERA PARTNER M/S VILLA REALCON LLP

  7. 7.M/S EMPIRE BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS THR SHRI KETAN VINOD VYAS

Case History

  1. 09-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Jun-2026

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)View PDF

    Case Summary: On 9th June 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Side) directed the Advocate for the Applicant to remove office objections within two weeks as a last chance. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and necessary orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Apr-2026

    For Notification (Objection Not Removed)

    Dr.M.S. Deshpande, Registrar (Judicial - II)

  4. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: On 9th June 2026, the High Court of Judicature at Bombay (Appellate Side) directed the Advocate for the Applicant to remove office objections within two weeks as a last chance. The Court warned that failure to comply would result in refusal of registration and necessary orders on the next date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case