MADHUKAR SAVLIRAM GUNJAL vs THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI TRIMBAKESHWAR SUB DIVISION AND ORS — WP/5954/2026

Case under Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA. Status: High On Board -. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

High On Board - Next hearing 16-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010152342026

Filing Number

WP/8807/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

WP/5954/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND ACQUISITION/REQUISITION(CENTRAL/STATE) ( 20 )

Sub-Category

COMPENSATION ( 8 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Right to Fair Compensation & Transparency in Land Acquisition,rehabilitation & Resettlement Act,2013 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MADHUKAR SAVLIRAM GUNJAL

    Adv. RAMESHWAR GITE

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER IGATPURI TRIMBAKESHWAR SUB DIVISION AND ORS

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR NASHIK

  3. 3.THE MAHARASHTRA INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION

    Adv. Jay and Co

  4. 4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE MINISTRY FOR INDUSTRIES TO BE SERVED THR. AGP

Case History

  1. 16-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    High On Board -

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale , Hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak Shirsat

  3. 05-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Manish Pitale,hon'ble Shri Justice Shreeram Vinayak ShirsatView PDF

    Summary of WP 5954/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted 17 consolidated writ petitions challenging land acquisition orders dated 22.02.2026 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik. The petitioners alleged the SDO failed to comply with the Court's previous October 2025 directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input before rejecting their acquisition objections. The Court found prima facie non-compliance and granted ad-interim relief: status quo on possession and mutation entries maintained until next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. WP/5954/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of WP 5954/2026 The Bombay High Court admitted 17 consolidated writ petitions challenging land acquisition orders dated 22.02.2026 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer, Nashik. The petitioners alleged the SDO failed to comply with the Court's previous October 2025 directions requiring detailed consideration of objections and Gram Sabha/Panchayat Samiti input before rejecting their acquisition objections. The Court found prima facie non-compliance and granted ad-interim relief: status quo on possession and mutation entries maintained until next hearing on 16.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case