SHRI. DYANESHWAR BABURAO SHIRSAT vs MADHAV KHANDERAO SHIRSATH (D/H) — SA/395/2014
Case under Transfer of Property Act. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: HCBM010151882014
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
SA/10233/2014
Filing Date
09-04-2014
Registration No
SA/395/2014
Registration Date
10-07-2014
Judge
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Coram
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
Bench Type
Single
Category
SUITS ( 38 )
Sub-Category
( 38 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHRI. DYANESHWAR BABURAO SHIRSAT
Adv. Pramod Narayan Joshi
Respondent(s)
MADHAV KHANDERAO SHIRSATH (D/H)
Adv. R NO 3,4A TO 4C,5 TO 11 ARE SERVED.,RESPONDENTS NO. 3, 4A TO 4C, 5, 6 & 8 TO 11,SA STAND ABATED AS AGAINST DECEASED R NO 1 & 2,VIDE REG JUDL II ORDER DT 26/06/2019.,JJ Associates,SACHIN GITE 1123 1.
SMT. BHAGIRATHIBAI MADHAV SHIRSATH1.
SMT. SHAKUNTALA MADHAV SHIRSATH1.
SHRI. RAMDAS MADHAV SHIRSATH1.
SHRI. SANTOSH MADHAV SHIRSATH (SINCE DECEASED THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS AND REPRESENTATIVES)1.4.
A) SMT. SARLA SANTOSH SHIRSATH1.4.
B) KU. ROHIT SANTOSH SHIRSATH1.4.
C) KU. SHWETA SANTOSH SHIRSATH (4B and 4C MINORS REPRESENTED THROUGH 4-A THEIR MOTHER )1.
SHRI. CHANDRAKANT MADHAV SHRISATH1.
SHRI. VIKRAM MADHAV SHRISATH1.
SAU. SANJANA UTTAM KAPSE1.
SAU. YESHODABAI ARUN KAPSE1.
SHRI. GIRISH MADHAV SHIRSATH1.
SAU. SHITAL PRASHANT SHINDE1.
TILOTTAMA @ TANUJA KAPSE
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE GAURI GODSE
FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS]
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION
FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS
FOR ORDERS (UNSERVED NOTICE)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 07-01-2021 | FOR ORDERS [CIVIL SIDE MATTERS] |
| 29-04-2026 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 06-11-2023 | FOR ADMISSION |
| 01-08-2019 | FOR ADMISSION - AFTER NOTICE CIVIL SIDE MATTERS |
| 26-06-2019 | FOR ORDERS (UNSERVED NOTICE) |
Orders
Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the Second Appeal No. 395 of 2014, raising a substantial question of law regarding whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration and injunction based on consolidation scheme entries challenged in a related Writ Petition. Notice was waived for certain respondents, while the appellant's advocate was directed to serve remaining respondents, file a private paper-book within one year, and the appeal will be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 5565 of 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The Bombay High Court admitted the Second Appeal No. 395 of 2014, raising a substantial question of law regarding whether the plaintiff is entitled to declaration and injunction based on consolidation scheme entries challenged in a related Writ Petition. Notice was waived for certain respondents, while the appellant's advocate was directed to serve remaining respondents, file a private paper-book within one year, and the appeal will be heard jointly with Writ Petition No. 5565 of 2019. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts