ANIKET VIJAY CHAVAN vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — BA/1442/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: HCBM010151592026

Filing Number

BA/6394/2026

Filing Date

26-Mar-2026

Registration No

BA/1442/2026

Registration Date

26-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

Bench Type

Single

Category

BAIL ( 51 )

Sub-Category

Regular ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483
Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 304(2),3(5)
Mah. Control of Organised Crime Act Section 3(1)(II),3(2),3(4)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANIKET VIJAY CHAVAN

    Adv. TAYADDE SUSHANT JAGADISH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

    The Bombay High Court granted bail to Aniket Vijay Chavan in a jewelry snatching case (Crime No. 511 of 2025), finding that he had been detained for approximately one year without a test identification parade being conducted and that trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court released him on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including regular police station attendance and a prohibition on tampering with evidence or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Admission (Bail Applications)

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar Dige

  4. 08-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Shivkumar DigeView PDF

  5. 08-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 26-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. BA/1442/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court granted bail to Aniket Vijay Chavan in a jewelry snatching case (Crime No. 511 of 2025), finding that he had been detained for approximately one year without a test identification parade being conducted and that trial conclusion would take considerable time. The court released him on a personal recognizance bond of Rs. 25,000 with sureties, subject to conditions including regular police station attendance and a prohibition on tampering with evidence or witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case