ANOJ ARVIND MENON vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA — HCBM10150082026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.

Next hearing 01-Apr-2026

CNR: HCBM010150082026

Filing Number

WP/6344/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

Bench Type

Single

Category

CRIMINAL ( 9 )

Sub-Category

QUASHING OF FIR C.R., CHARGE SHEET OR PROSECUTION ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal

Last updated 02-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 528
Constitution of India Section 21,227
Indian Penal Code (I.p.c) Section 109,120(B),406,409,465,466,468,471,420 R/W 34
Prevention of Corruption Act Section 13(1)(d) R/W 13(2) 13(1)(c)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ANOJ ARVIND MENON

    Adv. Maniar Srivastava Associates

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

Case History

  1. 01-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

    SUMMARY The Bombay High Court set aside a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against petitioner Anoj Arvind Menon (Accused No.7) in Special Case No.0102528/2024, finding it was issued illegally as the petitioner was never served with summons. Both the petitioner's counsel and the State's APP agreed the warrant could not be issued without proper service of summons. The court quashed the NBW on the petitioner's undertaking to appear in person before the Sessions Court on April 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. Bhobe

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ashwin D. BhobeView PDF

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY The Bombay High Court set aside a non-bailable warrant (NBW) issued against petitioner Anoj Arvind Menon (Accused No.7) in Special Case No.0102528/2024, finding it was issued illegally as the petitioner was never served with summons. Both the petitioner's counsel and the State's APP agreed the warrant could not be issued without proper service of summons. The court quashed the NBW on the petitioner's undertaking to appear in person before the Sessions Court on April 15, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case