AMIT PRAKASH BABAR vs UNION OF INDIA THR MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND ANR — HCBM10148742026

Case under Passports Act,1967. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010148742026

Filing Number

WP/8589/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 12-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Passports Act,1967

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMIT PRAKASH BABAR

    Adv. NITIN GAWARE PATIL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA THR MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND ANR

  2. 2.REGIONAL PASSPORT OFFICER

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 8589 of 2026, petitioner Amit Prakash Babar's petition against the Union of India and Regional Passport Officer failed to remove office objections by the deadline of 29th April 2026. The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, with warning that failure to remove objections will result in refusal of registration under the applicable procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 8589 of 2026, petitioner Amit Prakash Babar's petition against the Union of India and Regional Passport Officer failed to remove office objections by the deadline of 29th April 2026. The Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, with warning that failure to remove objections will result in refusal of registration under the applicable procedural rules. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case