KAILASH VITTHALRAO TANDALE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUG AND ORS — HCBM10148632026

Case under Pharmacy Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010148632026

Filing Number

WP/8583/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Pharmacy Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAILASH VITTHALRAO TANDALE

    Adv. Shailesh Kharat

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY MEDICAL EDUCATION AND DRUG AND ORS

  2. 2.MAHARASHTRA STATE PHARMACY COUNCIL, THR ITS PRESIDENT/ REGISTRAR

  3. 3.NATIONAL COMMISSION FOR SCHEDULED TRIBE, THR ITS CHAIRPERSON/ SECRETARY

  4. 4.SUPRIYA MUKESH PATIL

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 8583 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned proceedings after the petitioner Kailash Vitthalrao Tandale and his advocate failed to remove office objections within the prescribed time. The Court granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; if not remedied, the petition will be refused registration under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition No. 8583 of 2026, the Bombay High Court's Registrar (Judicial-I) adjourned proceedings after the petitioner Kailash Vitthalrao Tandale and his advocate failed to remove office objections within the prescribed time. The Court granted a two-week extension to cure the defects; if not remedied, the petition will be refused registration under the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case