UNION BANK OF INDIA vs State of Maharashtra — WP/5225/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010148522026
Next Hearing
10th June 2026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
WP/8575/2026
Filing Date
25-03-2026
Registration No
WP/5225/2026
Registration Date
17-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Coram
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
Bench Type
Division
Category
MERCANTILE LAWS COMMERCIAL TRANSACTIONS , BANKS ( 28 )
Sub-Category
MATTERS RELATING TO SECURITISATION AND RECONSTRUCTION OF FINANCIAL ASSETS ( 10 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
UNION BANK OF INDIA
Adv. Nainesh N Amin
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MANISH PITALE , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SHREERAM VINAYAK SHIRSAT
FRESH ADMISSION
FOR COMPLIANCE
FRESH ADMISSION
FRESH ADMISSION
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 10-06-2026 | FOR COMPLIANCE |
| 28-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
| 24-04-2026 | FRESH ADMISSION |
Orders
Case Summary: WP/5225/2026 Petition Allowed with Directions Union Bank of India's writ petition was allowed. The court directed the Additional Tahsildar, Pimpri-Chinchwad and Dapodi Police Station to take physical possession of a mortgaged flat from defaulting borrowers on 11/05/2026 and hand it over to the bank. The court found that the borrowers' re-occupation of the property after the bank's lawful possession defied the SARFAESI Act and Rule of Law, and ordered police assistance with adequate force and video documentation. The case was listed for compliance on 10/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: WP/5225/2026 Petition Allowed with Directions Union Bank of India's writ petition was allowed. The court directed the Additional Tahsildar, Pimpri-Chinchwad and Dapodi Police Station to take physical possession of a mortgaged flat from defaulting borrowers on 11/05/2026 and hand it over to the bank. The court found that the borrowers' re-occupation of the property after the bank's lawful possession defied the SARFAESI Act and Rule of Law, and ordered police assistance with adequate force and video documentation. The case was listed for compliance on 10/06/2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts