LATE KARBHARI NANA SABALE THR LR NANASAHEB ANANTHA SABLE vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS — WP/4705/2026

Case under Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 15th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010147882026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/8540/2026

Filing Date

25-03-2026

Registration No

WP/4705/2026

Registration Date

09-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

Bench Type

Division

Category

LAND REVENUE CODE MATTERS ( 57 )

Sub-Category

Division Bench ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

15th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Mah. Land Revenue Code, 1966 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

LATE KARBHARI NANA SABALE THR LR NANASAHEB ANANTHA SABLE

Adv. Sumit V Khaire

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR GOVT PLEADER AND ORS

THE COLLECTOR PUNE

TAHSILDAR SHIRUR

THE SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER SHIRUR

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK , HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

15-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

15-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE M. S. KARNIK,HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE S. M. MODAK

The Bombay High Court directed the Collector of Pune to decide the petitioner's representation (filed June 6, 2016) for permanent allotment of encroached government land in Sabalewadi village within 6 months, in accordance with Maharashtra Land Revenue Code provisions. The petitioner, as legal heir, is willing to pay occupancy price for regularization under Section 51 of the MLR Code, 1966 and Rule 43 of the MLR Rules, 1971. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court directed the Collector of Pune to decide the petitioner's representation (filed June 6, 2016) for permanent allotment of encroached government land in Sabalewadi village within 6 months, in accordance with Maharashtra Land Revenue Code provisions. The petitioner, as legal heir, is willing to pay occupancy price for regularization under Section 51 of the MLR Code, 1966 and Rule 43 of the MLR Rules, 1971. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case