Mukesh Kishormal Jain vs Om Navkar Skyline Pvt Ltd — HCBM10146572026

Case under C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010146572026

e-Filing Number

20-03-2026

Filing Number

WP/8473/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

C.p.c.- (Interlocutory Order) Section 151
Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mukesh Kishormal Jain

    Adv. RAJESH JAIN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Om Navkar Skyline Pvt Ltd

  2. 2.Argo Electric Corporation A Partnership Firm

  3. 3.Rajitha Harshappan Janaki

  4. 4.Jalaja Rama Harshappan

  5. 5.Jalaram Raman Harshappan

  6. 6.Janaki Belangil V Govind

  7. 7.Jairaj Govind

  8. 8.Vinayan Cheekoli Govind

  9. 9.Ramesh Cheekoli Govind

  10. 10.Panagavil Sreedhar Kumar

  11. 11.State of Maharashtra Through the Office of AGP

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 24-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: Mukesh Kishormal Jain v. Om Navkar Skyline Pvt Ltd Outcome: The Bombay High Court's Registrar adjourned the case and granted a two-week extension to the petitioner and advocate to cure office objections in Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8473 of 2026. If objections remain uncured, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Rules 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Mukesh Kishormal Jain v. Om Navkar Skyline Pvt Ltd Outcome: The Bombay High Court's Registrar adjourned the case and granted a two-week extension to the petitioner and advocate to cure office objections in Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8473 of 2026. If objections remain uncured, registration will be refused under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Rules 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case