SONAL DEV-CON PVT. LTD. vs UNION OF INDIA THR. MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION AND ORS — HCBM10146332026
Case under Aircraft Act (73) 1934. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010146332026
Filing Number
WP/8466/2026
Filing Date
24-Mar-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
ENERGY ( 55 )
Sub-Category
Wind ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SONAL DEV-CON PVT. LTD.
Adv. MAHADIKANDASSOCIATES
Respondent(s)
-
1.UNION OF INDIA THR. MINISTRY OF CIVIL AVIATION AND ORS
-
2.AIRPORT AUTHORITY OF INDIA THROUGH REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR WESTERN REGION HEADQURETERS
Adv. Mayur Shetty
-
3.NAVI MUMBAI INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT PVT. LTD (NMIAPL) THR. REGIONAL EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR REGION
Adv. WADIA GHANDY AND CO
-
4.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THR. DEPARTMENT OF URBAN DEVELOPMENT
-
5.NAVI MUMBAI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION (NMMC) THR. TOWN PLANNER/EXEUCTIVE ENGINEER DEPARTMENT OF BUILG.
-
6.CITY AND INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF MAHARASHTRA THR. ASSISTANT ESTATE OFFICER
Case History
-
08-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
08-Jun-2026
Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8466 of 2026 filed by Sonal Dev-Con Pvt. Ltd. against the Union of India and others at the Bombay High Court, the petitioner failed to remove office objections after being notified on 23rd/24th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks' time to the petitioner and their advocate to cure the defects. Upon failure to comply within this extended period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Apr-2026
Objections To Be Removed
Assistant Registrar
-
24-Mar-2026
Case filed
Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8466 of 2026 filed by Sonal Dev-Con Pvt. Ltd. against the Union of India and others at the Bombay High Court, the petitioner failed to remove office objections after being notified on 23rd/24th April 2026. The Registrar (Judicial-I) granted an additional two weeks' time to the petitioner and their advocate to cure the defects. Upon failure to comply within this extended period, the petition will be rejected under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts