CANTEEN STORES DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES UNION THROU. UTTAM R MORAYE vs THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. SEC LABOUR DEPT AND ANR — HCBM10146252026

Case under Trade Unions Act, 1926. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010146252026

Filing Number

WP/8460/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Trade Unions Act, 1926

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CANTEEN STORES DEPARTMENT EMPLOYEES UNION THROU. UTTAM R MORAYE

    Adv. GHAMRE SURESH ANANDRAO,Sarang Gundajwar,Sarang Gundajwar, ,Sarang Gundajwar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROU. SEC LABOUR DEPT AND ANR

  2. 2.DEPUTY REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS KONKAN DIVISION KAMGAR BHAVAN

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Canteen Stores Department Employees Union, granting two weeks to the petitioner and their advocate to cure office objections that were previously notified on 23-24 April 2026. Upon failure to remove these defects within the extended period, the court will pass an appropriate order refusing registration of the petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court adjourned the writ petition filed by Canteen Stores Department Employees Union, granting two weeks to the petitioner and their advocate to cure office objections that were previously notified on 23-24 April 2026. Upon failure to remove these defects within the extended period, the court will pass an appropriate order refusing registration of the petition under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case