THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION THORUGH ASST.PF.COM.(LEGAL)and vs KALPESH ENTERPRISES — WP/5867/2018

Case under Employment Provident Fund & Misc. P. Act. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 30th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010146222018

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

03rd January 2019

Filing Number

WP/9402/2018

Filing Date

23-03-2018

Registration No

WP/5867/2018

Registration Date

31-05-2018

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Employment Provident Fund & Misc. P. Act

Petitioner(s)

THE CENTRAL BOARD OF TRUSTEES, EMPLOYEES PROVIDENT FUND ORGANIZATION THORUGH ASST.PF.COM.(LEGAL)and

Adv. Suresh Kumar

ASSISTANTL PROVIDENT FUND COMMISSIONER

Respondent(s)

KALPESH ENTERPRISES

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

03-01-2019

FOR ADMISSION

30-04-2026

FOR ADMISSION

24-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

12-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

26-11-2025

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

30-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE AMIT BORKAR

The Bombay High Court set aside the Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal's November 2, 2016 order imposing damages under Section 14B of the EPF Act against Kalpesh Enterprises for delayed contributions, finding the Tribunal improperly relied on a Delhi High Court judgment that the Supreme Court had already overturned. The court remanded the matter to reconsider damages with correct legal principles and factual examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Bombay High Court set aside the Provident Fund Appellate Tribunal's November 2, 2016 order imposing damages under Section 14B of the EPF Act against Kalpesh Enterprises for delayed contributions, finding the Tribunal improperly relied on a Delhi High Court judgment that the Supreme Court had already overturned. The court remanded the matter to reconsider damages with correct legal principles and factual examination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Explore other courts

Search Another Case