TRUPTINDUR ANANTRAO JAGTAP AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — HCBM10146132026
Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.
CNR: HCBM010146132026
Next Hearing
08th June 2026
Filing Number
WP/8451/2026
Filing Date
24-03-2026
Judge
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Coram
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
Bench Type
Division
Category
TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 99 )
Judicial Branch
Civil
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
TRUPTINDUR ANANTRAO JAGTAP AND ANR
Adv. M R BARVE
MALPRABHA VINAYAK SALKE (MISS MALPRABHA ANANTRAO JAGTAP)
Respondent(s)
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS
PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION
RAJESETU PROJECTS PVT. LTD
ANJALI RAJENDRA TAPADIA
Hearing History
Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)
OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 23-04-2026 | OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED |
Orders
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8451 of 2026 filed by Truptindur Anantrao Jagtap and others against the State of Maharashtra and others was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, after which appropriate action under Rule 3(iii) will be taken if objections remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8451 of 2026 filed by Truptindur Anantrao Jagtap and others against the State of Maharashtra and others was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, after which appropriate action under Rule 3(iii) will be taken if objections remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts