TRUPTINDUR ANANTRAO JAGTAP AND ANR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS — HCBM10146132026

Case under Mah. Regional Town Planning Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010146132026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8451/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

TOWN PLANNING ( 39 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

Mah. Regional Town Planning Act

Petitioner(s)

TRUPTINDUR ANANTRAO JAGTAP AND ANR

Adv. M R BARVE

MALPRABHA VINAYAK SALKE (MISS MALPRABHA ANANTRAO JAGTAP)

Respondent(s)

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS

PUNE MUNICIPAL CORPORATION

RAJESETU PROJECTS PVT. LTD

ANJALI RAJENDRA TAPADIA

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

23-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

Orders

08-06-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8451 of 2026 filed by Truptindur Anantrao Jagtap and others against the State of Maharashtra and others was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, after which appropriate action under Rule 3(iii) will be taken if objections remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Writ Petition No. 8451 of 2026 filed by Truptindur Anantrao Jagtap and others against the State of Maharashtra and others was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections. The petitioners and their advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration as per Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted a final two-week extension to cure the defects, after which appropriate action under Rule 3(iii) will be taken if objections remain unresolved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case