PUTALABAI BALU GAIKWAD DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir) vs VITTHAL SHANKAR CHAUDHARY DECD THROU.L.H. 1. — HCBM10145872026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010145872026

Filing Number

WP/8434/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUTALABAI BALU GAIKWAD DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir)

    Adv. Avinash Vasantrao Joshi 1.

  2. 2.NANASAHEB BALU GAIKWAD1.

  3. 3.HANUMANT BALU GAIKWAD1.

  4. 4.KRISHNABAI BALU GAIKWAD (DECEASED)

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.VITTHAL SHANKAR CHAUDHARY DECD THROU.L.H. 1.

  2. 2.SONUABAI VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

  3. 3.BALASO VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

  4. 4.SHANTABAI VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

  5. 5.RANJANA SADASHIV KALBHOR1.

  6. 6.LATA VILAS MANE1.

  7. 7.MANGAL RAJENDRA SHELKE1.

  8. 8.SANGITA SANJAY DIVEKAR

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8434 of 2026 was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 24-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8434 of 2026 was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case