PUTALABAI BALU GAIKWAD DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir) vs VITTHAL SHANKAR CHAUDHARY DECD THROU.L.H. 1. — HCBM10145872026

Case under B.t. & A.l. Act. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

CNR: HCBM010145872026

Next Hearing

08th June 2026

Filing Number

WP/8434/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Single

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

Orders passed by Quasi Judicial Authority Other than Labour and Industrial Court ( 105 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Acts & Sections

B.t. & A.l. Act

Petitioner(s)

PUTALABAI BALU GAIKWAD DECD THROU. L.H.(Legal Heir)

Adv. Avinash Vasantrao Joshi 1.

NANASAHEB BALU GAIKWAD1.

HANUMANT BALU GAIKWAD1.

KRISHNABAI BALU GAIKWAD (DECEASED)

Respondent(s)

VITTHAL SHANKAR CHAUDHARY DECD THROU.L.H. 1.

SONUABAI VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

BALASO VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

SHANTABAI VITTHAL CHAUDHARY1.

RANJANA SADASHIV KALBHOR1.

LATA VILAS MANE1.

MANGAL RAJENDRA SHELKE1.

SANGITA SANJAY DIVEKAR

Hearing History

Judge: Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

24-04-2026

OBJECTIONS TO BE REMOVED

Orders

08-06-2026
Shri. P. P. JADHAV, Registrar(Judl I)

Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8434 of 2026 was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8434 of 2026 was notified on 23rd/24th April 2026 for removal of office objections, but the petitioners and their advocate failed to comply. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3 sub-rule (iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If office objections remain unresolved, registration will be refused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case