Vinayak Barku Mharse vs state of Maharashtra — CP/209/2026

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 215. Status: Fresh Admission. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.

Fresh Admission Next hearing 15-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010145652026

e-Filing Number

21-03-2026

Filing Number

CP/8422/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Registration No

CP/209/2026

Registration Date

02-Apr-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Coram

Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

Bench Type

Division

Category

CONTEMPT OF COURT ( 8 )

Sub-Category

CIVIL CONTEMPT ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinayak Barku Mharse

    Adv. Mahesh Vijay Rawool

  2. 2.Rajendra Balkrishna Jage

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  3. 3.Shamrao Ramchandra Gaikwad

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  4. 4.Krishna Lodhu Patil

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  5. 5.Shantaram Bal Bhalekar

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  6. 6.Ramchandra Ganpat More

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  7. 7.Smt Pranali Pramod Gandhi

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  8. 8.Dashrath Sadu Jadhav

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  9. 9.Krishna Kakadya Bhavar

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  10. 10.Ramdas Santu Bidave

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  11. 11.Shraddha Shridhar Vichare

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  12. 12.Pundlik Nashik Patil

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  13. 13.Ramesh Somnath Joshi

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  14. 14.Raghunath Pandurang Veer

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  15. 15.Shital Prabhakar Sathe

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  16. 16.Vidya Vinayak Vichare

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  17. 17.Devendra Vishwnath Patil

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  18. 18.Ramesh Mukund Vide

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  19. 19.Ananta Shravan Gharat

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  20. 20.Supriya Kishor Palkar

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  21. 21.Pradnya Sudhir Zarapkar

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  22. 22.Deepak Nago Nerkar

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  23. 23.Radhakrishna Pandurang Bhade

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  24. 24.Gurunath Duttateya Patil

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  25. 25.Sayali Suhas Sawant

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  26. 26.Mangala Bhagwan Wawhal

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  27. 27.Ramesh Sukhdev Ghongade

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  28. 28.Peter Josheph Fernandis

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

  29. 29.Vidula Vinayak Vedpathak

    Adv. RAWOOL MAHESH VIJAY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.state of Maharashtra

  2. 2.State of Maharashtra

  3. 3.Rohan Ghuge

  4. 4.Manoj Ranade

  5. 5.Ranjit Yadav

    Adv. ARD

  6. 6.Avinash Phadtare

    Adv. ARD

Case History

  1. 15-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao Venegavkar

  3. 06-May-2026

    Fresh Admission

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge , Hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. Mantri

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Hiten Shamrao VenegavkarView PDF

    Case Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 209 of 2026, the Bombay High Court accepted the State's voluminous affidavit with supporting documents on May 4, 2026. The petitioners' advocate requested time to review the materials received in court. The case was adjourned and stood over to June 15, 2026, in the urgent category for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 07-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge,hon'ble Shri Justice Abhay J. MantriView PDF

  6. 07-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CP/209/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Contempt Petition No. 209 of 2026, the Bombay High Court accepted the State's voluminous affidavit with supporting documents on May 4, 2026. The petitioners' advocate requested time to review the materials received in court. The case was adjourned and stood over to June 15, 2026, in the urgent category for further hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case