AMIT KANTILAL LUNKAD AND ANR vs AZIZ VAZIR KHAN AND ORS — WP/4854/2026

Case under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

CNR: HCBM010145432026

CASE DISPOSED

Filing Number

WP/8409/2026

Filing Date

24-03-2026

Registration No

WP/4854/2026

Registration Date

10-04-2026

Judge

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Coram

HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Bench Type

Single

Category

RENT ACT ( 34 )

Sub-Category

INTERIM ORDER/AD-INTERIM ORDER PASSED IN RENT ACT MATTERS ( 12 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Decision Date

29th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Section NA

Petitioner(s)

AMIT KANTILAL LUNKAD AND ANR

Adv. SIDDHARTH SUTARIA

AMOL KANTILAL LUNKAD

Respondent(s)

AZIZ VAZIR KHAN AND ORS

NAZIR VAZIR KHAN

USMAN VAZIR KHAN

RIYAZ VAZIR KHAN

AYYUB VAZIR KHAN

DAWOOD VAZIR KHAN

YUSUF VAZIR KHAN

SULEMAN VAZIR KHAN

TAYYAB VAZIR KHAN

Hearing History

Judge: HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

15-04-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

15-06-2026

FOR CIRCULATION

Orders

29-04-2026
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE SANDEEP V. MARNE

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by defendants Amit Kantilal Lunkad and another, who sought to challenge the District Court's rejection of their delay condonation applications. The defendants, who defaulted on rent payments and failed to appear during trial, filed appeals 280 days late against eviction decrees. The court found their justifications—including mental trauma, financial constraints, and family hardship—vague and unsupported by documentary evidence, and noted that as renowned builders with litigation experience, they could have easily filed appeals timely. The court upheld the District Court's dismissal, emphasizing the defendants' negligent conduct both during trial and post-decree, and found no merit in the petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Bombay High Court dismissed the writ petitions filed by defendants Amit Kantilal Lunkad and another, who sought to challenge the District Court's rejection of their delay condonation applications. The defendants, who defaulted on rent payments and failed to appear during trial, filed appeals 280 days late against eviction decrees. The court found their justifications—including mental trauma, financial constraints, and family hardship—vague and unsupported by documentary evidence, and noted that as renowned builders with litigation experience, they could have easily filed appeals timely. The court upheld the District Court's dismissal, emphasizing the defendants' negligent conduct both during trial and post-decree, and found no merit in the petitions. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case