VIJAYTA AKASH SABLE vs MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS — HCBM10145382026

Case under Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010145382026

Filing Number

WP/8405/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

LABOUR MATTERS DB ( 19 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Mah. Housing & Area Devolopment Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.VIJAYTA AKASH SABLE

    Adv. PAVITRA MANESH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHARASHTRA HOUSING AREA DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY AND ORS

  2. 2.THE CHIEF ACCOUNTS OFFICER MHADA

  3. 3.THE CHAIRMAN MHADA

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8405 of 2026, petitioner Vijayta Akash Sable's petition against MHADA and others was notified for removal of office objections on 23rd/24th April 2026. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, the petition will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Apr-2026

    Objections To Be Removed

    Assistant Registrar

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 8405 of 2026, petitioner Vijayta Akash Sable's petition against MHADA and others was notified for removal of office objections on 23rd/24th April 2026. The petitioner and advocate failed to remove these objections. Rather than immediately refusing registration under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII of the Bombay High Court Rules, 1960, the Registrar granted an additional two weeks to cure the defects. If objections remain unremoved, the petition will be rejected. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case