M/S. GLS ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD. vs DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH THE DY DIRECTOR — HCBM10145272026

Case under Prevention of Money Laundering Act. Status: For Orders (Objection Not Removed). Next hearing: 19th June 2026.

For Orders (Objection Not Removed) Next hearing 19-Jun-2026 this date has passed

CNR: HCBM010145272026

Filing Number

WP/8394/2026

Filing Date

24-Mar-2026

Judge

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Coram

Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

Bench Type

Division

Category

ORDINARY CIVIL ( 30 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 99 )

Judicial Branch

Civil

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Prevention of Money Laundering Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S. GLS ELECTRONIC INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD.

    Adv. RAHUL AGARWAL AND ASSOCIATES

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH THE DY DIRECTOR

Case History

  1. 19-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    For Orders (Objection Not Removed)

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)

  3. 08-May-2026

    Shri. P. P. Jadhav, Registrar(Judl I)View PDF

    Case Outcome Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar adjourned GLS Electronic Industries Pvt. Ltd.'s Writ Petition after the petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 22, 2026 deadline. The court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in petition dismissal under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Rules 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Mar-2026

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Outcome Summary: The Bombay High Court's Registrar adjourned GLS Electronic Industries Pvt. Ltd.'s Writ Petition after the petitioner and advocate failed to remove office objections by the April 22, 2026 deadline. The court granted a two-week extension (excluding summer vacation) to cure the defects; failure to comply will result in petition dismissal under Rule 3(iii) of Chapter XVII, Bombay High Court Rules 1960. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case